WEBA celebrates 400 years of Baptist History by publishing this series by Rev Roger Hayden, which traces the history of our movement with a particular slant towards the West of England
Thursday, 5 April 2012
3. What did Jesus accomplish on the cross?
A GENERAL BAPTIST REPLY
Imagine holding a mirror before your present church’s congregation. What would you see in the mirror? Many of our Baptist forefathers might well have answered: the Church of Jesus as it is described in the Gospels. In the time of Queen Elizabeth 1st, it was very plain to see that this was not so. Some people wanted Bishops out of the picture. Many objected to some of the services in the Book of Common Prayer. Others thought that the State should be totally separated from the life of the Church.
Thomas Cartwright of Cambridge University was prepared to give the Church in England time to put its house in order. Robert Browne vehemently disagreed, his tract in 1582 calling for A Treatise of Reformation without tarrying for any. When Browne and his friend Harrison were persecuted by both Church and State, they emigrated to Middleburg, in Europe. They were soon joined by other congregations led by John Penry, Henry Ainsworth, and Francis Johnson. Another group led by John Robinson had fled to Leyden, and it was from this group that some members left, first on the ship Speedwell, before transferring to the Mayflower. William Brewster, who became one of the ‘Pilgrim Fathers’, was from this group who arrived in America in June 1620. Another group which went from Gainsborough, Lincs, was led by a former Anglican priest, John Smyth, who set up the first English Baptist Church in Amsterdam.
Smyth was born c.1570, and began his studies at Christ’s College, Cambridge in 1586, where one of his tutors was Francis Johnson. At University, Smyth was in trouble with the authorities for objections he made to the burial service, wearing the surplice and the ‘churching of women’. The last was still being objected to by Dorothy Hazard in Broadmead, 50 years later! Smyth continued in trouble with the Anglican authorities, but arrived in a Gainsborough parish, on the borders of Nottinghamshire. While here, Smyth styled himself as ‘the pastor of the Gainsborough Church’. Among those he met with at this time, were Richard Clifton, rector of Babworth, who emigrated to Amsterdam, 1608; William Brewster who went to Leyden; and a local lawyer, Thomas Helwys, a member with him at Gainsborough.
Helwys did his legal training at Grays’ Inn, London, before getting married and settling down at Broxtowe Hall, Nottinghamshire. He was a member in Smyth’s Gainsborough congregation, and played a key role in getting the congregation safely to Amsterdam, where they were housed in the great bakehouse of Jan Munter. Here they were at last free to worship according to the dictates of their consciences as guided by the New Testament, and also free as A C Underwood comments, ‘to experience all the evils of overcrowding, from exacerbated tempers to the plague’.
In 1610 John Smyth and about 30 members asked to join the Mennonite church, believing that they had been wrong to baptize themselves. They had baptized themselves at a time when they believed that no pure New Testament Church existed, but now they had made contact with the baptizing congregation of Menno Simons, they felt this should be their ‘church’ home. Helwys and the other half of the members became a distinct Baptist congregation in 1612. In 1612 Helwys published the first claim in English for complete freedom of worship. The book, with its unusual title, A Short Declaration of the Mistery of Iniquity, published in Amsterdam, was sent to King James 1, with a note on the fly-leaf from Helwys to the King.
‘Hear, O King, and despise not the counsel of the poor...The king is a mortal man and not God: therefore he hath no power over immortal souls of his subjects, to make laws and ordinances for them, and to set spiritual Lords over them’.
In the body of the book Helwys wrote:
‘men’s religion to God, is betwixt God and themselves; the King shall not answer for it, neither may the King be judge between God and man. Let them be heretics, Turks, Jews and whatsoever it appertains not to the earthly power to punish them in the least measure. This is made evident to our Lord the King by the Scriptures.’[p.85]
General Baptists persistently argued for religious freedom and toleration. They did not believe that anyone was destined by a divine decree to damnation, but that all people had the possibility of repenting, believing the Gospel that Christ came to save sinners. This also led them to argue most strongly that nobody should be killed for their mistaken beliefs. This act might defeat the purposes of God whose will it is that all people should repent, find forgiveness, and live in Christ forever.
We now return to our original question: what did Jesus accomplish by his life, death and resurrection? The earliest English Baptist answer was not a Calvinist one. General Baptists did NOT believe that before the world began, God in his wisdom had already decided who should be saved. General Baptists preferred the teaching of Calvin’s successor, Jacob Arminius, and were please to be called, Arminian or General Baptists because of their conviction. As indicated at the close of our second article, how we to-day answer the question: ‘what did God in Christ ultimately accomplish at Calvary?’ is fundamental for Baptists.
ROGER HAYDEN
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment